ranjbar, M., Rashidi, S. (2018). The Relationship between Different Types of Thinking and Innovation of School Managers. Journal of Education Experiences, 1(2), 99-114.
mokhtar ranjbar; Solaiman Rashidi. "The Relationship between Different Types of Thinking and Innovation of School Managers". Journal of Education Experiences, 1, 2, 2018, 99-114.
ranjbar, M., Rashidi, S. (2018). 'The Relationship between Different Types of Thinking and Innovation of School Managers', Journal of Education Experiences, 1(2), pp. 99-114.
ranjbar, M., Rashidi, S. The Relationship between Different Types of Thinking and Innovation of School Managers. Journal of Education Experiences, 2018; 1(2): 99-114.
The Relationship between Different Types of Thinking and Innovation of School Managers
1Department of Management, Lamerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamerd, Iran
2Master of Educational Research, Lamerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamerd, Iran
Abstract
Mokhtar Ranjbar(Corresponding author, Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Lamerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamerd, Iran) ranjbarmokhtar@yahoo.com Solaiman Rashidi(Master of Educational Research, Lamerd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lamerd, Iran)
The purpose of this research is to investigate the relationship between different types of thinking and innovation among school managers. This research is applied in terms of method, descriptive-correlation. The statistical population of the study includes all school managers in Mohr city that are 57 persons. Due to the limited statistical population, the census method was used to select the sample and the entire statistical society was considered. For data collection, Harrison & Bramson Standard Thinking Questionnaire (2002) and Zare'i Innovation Scale (2006) were used. For the Thinking Questionnaire, the reliability coefficient was 0.81 for Cronbach's alpha and 0.86 for the Innovation Questionnaire, which have high reliability. In order to achieve the desired validity of the questionnaires, the validity of the content was evaluated by the opinion the supervisor. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 19, descriptive statistics at first level and inferential statistics methods (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Pearson correlation coefficient, regression analysis, t-test for two samples Independent) has been used. The results of the research showed that there is a significant relationship between thinking styles (pragmatism and realism) and innovation of school principals in the city of Mohr. However, there is no meaningful relationship between the thinking styles (combining, idealism and analyticity) and the innovation of the school principals in the city of Mohr. Thinking styles (combining, pragmatism, and realism) have been significant predictors of innovation (cultural dimension). Thinking styles (idealism, pragmatism, and realism) have been significant predictors of innovation (structural dimension).
Abrisham. M. I. (2005). The Role of Education in the Growth of Creative Thinking. MSc Thesis. Islamic azad university, Science and Research branch.(In Persian)
Albaili, M. A. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Thinking Styles Inventory: Evidence from United Arab Emirates. Proceedings of the 2006 Joint Annual conference of the Australian psychologys Society and New Zealand Psychological Society, Auckland, New Zeahand, 26 – 30 September, 2006.
Armstrong, S. J. (2006). The influence of individual cognitive style on performance in management education. Educational Psychology, 20, 323 – 339.
Babaei, S. (2010).Assessment of creativity and innovation and its effective factors among teacher education students. Master's thesis, Tehran, Tarbiat Moalem University, Faculty of Education, Pages 1-14-15. (In Persian)
Baird, J. R. & White, R.T. (2017). Promoting self control of learning. Instructional Science, 11, 227 – 247.
Biggs, J. B. (2014). Individual and group differences in study processes. British Journal of Educational psychology, 48, 266 – 279..
Busato, V.V. Prins, F.J. Elshout, J.J.& Hamaker, C. (2012).Intellectual ability, learning style personality , achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and individual differences , 29-1057-1008.
Diseth, A.(2014).Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. Educational and psychological, 17,143-155.
Harper, G. & Kember, D. (2009). Learning styles of students in two distance learning institutes. Paper presented at the 13th world conference International Council for Distance Education. Melbourne.
Iran Zadeh, S. (2008). Recognition and Priorities of Participatory Management in the Executive System, Journal of Applied Management of Public Administration, No. 33-34, p.8.
Karimi, Y. (2007). Social Psychology (Theories, Concepts, Applications). Tehran: Arasbaran publication. (In Persian)
Kember, D. & leung, D.Y. P. (2013). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: an investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 68. 395-407.
Series, P. (2010). Cognitive styles (from the perspective of education). Translated by Dariush Nowroozi and Akbar Salehi. Tehran: Amir Publishing. (In Persian)
Top